A Proposal For Updating The US Constitution

The way the current United States administration has disregarded the constitution and the will of the American people, is there any point left in having a constitution? From the Bastion of Urban Renewal and Progress (BURP), here is a new, re-writing of the US Constituion. 

For Making The Constitution More Compatible With The Modern Age

This proposal has been created and authorized by our organization, the Bastion of Urban Renewal and Progress (BURP).  This is a community organization which has its home office on the upper west side of Manhattan, and is dedicated to the betterment of humanity, the cleanliness of the earth and the causes of equality within and between all nations.

We here at our organization (BURP) have always considered the constitution a living and breathing document that should be updated periodically to reflect the changing needs of our community.  However, it has gotten more difficult over the years to take a document that was written in the 18th century and keep it contemporary.  Therefore, rather than amend the constitution, and continue to put tape and paper clips on an old and out-dated document, it is time for a complete re-writing of the constitution.  We will start here with the first 10 amendments known as the Bill of Rights.

The first amendment to the constitution reads thusly: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Many people in our organization were shocked to learn that the phrase "Wall of separation between church and state" was not actually in the document.  We need to remedy this.  The phrase "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion" seems fine on the surface but we want to be careful in limiting the power of what congress can do.   We want congress to be able to freely pass laws for the benefit of the many people who may not know what is in their best interests.

It is also important to define what religion is.  Is a religion anything that prays to a God?  Is it anything that utilizes a church?  And how can a church be defined?  All this needs to be written into the new document so that there is no ambiguity.

Just to digress for a moment, we are not concerned about the intent of the so-called "Founders".  Our goal in this re-writing is to come up with a fair and just document by which the country can be moved into the modern age and to stop being governed by outdated and unfair concepts.

The phrase "prohibiting the free exercise thereof" is a problem.  Congress must have the power to prohibit religious practices because it conflicts with the new "Wall of Separation" clause.

Speaking of the important "Wall of Separation" clause and just as a side anecdote to this, I had a conversation the other day with my son Rainbow.  He told me that at school the teacher was talking about the "big bang" theory and how all life was formed by the random combination of trillions of molecules and atoms.   Another student actually had the nerve to offer the ill-advised opinion that maybe it wasn't random, that maybe there was an intelligent design to all this.   Can you imagine the arrogance of people to think that they were created by some invisible mythical being rather than the random combination of molecules?   Now if someone wants to have a misguided opinion, that is his or her right but to try to force that religious view on a classroom of kids is exactly the kind of situation that this new revised constitution will stop.  My son Rainbow should not have to listen to the rantings of a religious fanatic in a classroom setting.

As for "Freedom of Assembly" and "petitioning government for grievances" – these have become huge problems.  We are very concerned that the freedom of congress to act in the best interests of the people has been severely limited by this ill-defined clause.  Clearly the "founders" did not anticipate such things as talk radio, the internet, cable TV and so forth.  The improvements to the printing press, alone, make much of the language concerning "freedom of speech" obsolete.

We have seen recently with the tea party movement that government clearly needs to have a role in how and when people can assemble and petition the government for a "redress of grievances".  We have seen how people can distort what congress and the president are trying to do.  Congress and the president must and shall have the freedom to do what is in the best interests of the people and must be able to restrict the people from putting out information that contradicts the good intentions of the government.

So, without further adieu, here is the new revised first amendment to the Constitution of the United States:

There is a distinct separation between church and state.  Church is defined as any dwelling, be it of brick, wood, metal, or other structural materials, or any boundary whatsoever, where there is reverence or prayer being given to any being or entity which cannot be substantiated through scientific means.   Church is distinct from the word religion which is defined as any belief system that involves prayer or devotion to any being that cannot be scientifically verified.  Prayer is defined as words or gestures, thoughts or feelings directed towards a being or entity that cannot be verified through the scientific method.  Worship of the sun, the earth, water, or any other physically verifiable, scientific entity is not considered a "church" or "religion" under this definition and therefore is not subject to restrictions.

Whereas the church and the state are considered to be two distinct entities, all activities associated with the church, including but not limited to prayer, religious clothing and jewelry, religious ornaments such as trees or candle holders with religious intent, are not to be permitted in buildings that are owned, operated or rented by the government or used by the government for any purpose, be it official or otherwise.

Whereas the practicing of religion, regardless of the location of the said practice, involves the training of people in such practices, and whereas these practices, thoughts and opinions are likely to be brought into government offices or schools, either consciously or subconsciously, it is incumbent upon the congress to restrict these practices.  Congress, therefore, shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.   In rare circumstances, private religious events may be permissible but congress shall have the authority to levy a tax on the religious event and to monitor the proceedings in such an matter as is deemed appropriate.

Whereas people (people being defined as living beings of the homo sapien species who are not a member of the United States congress, senate, judiciary or executive branch of government) have gathered in public places and contradicted the words, intentions, policies, and strategies of congress and whereas said people have made it difficult for the government to act in their interests, and whereas said people have violated the right of congress and the executive branch of government to levy new taxes, and whereas these same said people have raised money to disseminate information in a manner not approved of by congress, we do declare on this 17th day of April in the year of our Mother Earth of Two thousand ten the following:

That the freedom of speech and debates or proceedings in congress and the senate ought not to be impeached or questioned in any court or place outside of the congress and the senate.

That the gathering of people to protest the good policies of congress without the consent of congress is pernicious and illegal.

That criticism of the President, whether through print, broadcast, internet, or radio, is tantamount to incitement to violence and is illegal, unless that President is deemed, by a special commission (see more on this commission in the addendum to the First Amendment to the Constitution), to be worthy of said criticism.

Well, that's it for the new First Amendment!  We will soon make available the addendum to the first amendment to the constitution in PDF format (all 36 pages), as well as the rider to the new first amendment (all 27 pages).

We here at our organization (BURP) are dedicated to creating a more perfect union.  To this end, we have recognized that the people have encroached upon the freedom of congress.  The government needs to get on with the job of ruining the country without interference.  We will continue to work tirelessly to this end.  Look for continued updates to the constitution as next time we will offer you our new second amendment!


Howard Jacobs
MBA Marketing Pace University
I currently work for a large finacial institution.
I started the blog EndTheChange because I am outraged at the direction our country is going in. People who feel this way want to know "What can I do?" This blog is my little way of trying to set the record straight on the upside-down state of our country.

This entry was posted in Censorship, Church and State, Humor, US Constitution. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply